Izdzīvoja vai kā?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

vēl nē

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

bet ārsti pie tā strādā

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Tad jau vairs ne.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

jādomā, ka policija jau ir aizturējusi to aktieri, kurš arī bija pretendējis uz šo lomu

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Tas noteikti bija bin Ladena pirksts.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

parastās aizkulišu intrigas

(Reply to this) (Parent)

An actor slit his throat on stage when the prop knife for his suicide scene turned out to be a real one.

Daniel Hoevels, 30, slumped over with blood pouring from his neck while the audience broke into applause at the "special effect". Police are investigating whether the knife was a mistake or a murder plot. They are questioning the rest of the cast, and backstage hands with access to props; they will also carry out DNA tests.

Things went wrong at Vienna's Burgtheater as Hoevels' character went to "kill himself" in the final scene of Friedrich Schiller's Mary Stuart, about Mary Queen of Scots, on Saturday night

It was only when he did not get up to take a bow that anyone realised something had gone wrong.

Though bleeding profusely, Hoevels survived because the knife missed the carotid artery as it sliced into his neck. Wolfgang Lenz, a doctor who treated him, said: "Just a little bit deeper and he would have been drowning in his own blood."

One officer told Austrian TV news: "The rumours are wild, with some claiming that he was the victim of jealous rival.

"We don't know anything for sure yet; we have to work through everyone."

The knife was reportedly bought at a local shop; one possibility is that the props staff forgot to blunt its blade. "The knife even still had the price tag on it," an investigator said.

After emergency treatment at a hospital, Hoevels declared that the show must go on, and returned to the stage on Sunday night with a bandage tied around his neck, ready to once again meet his mock demise.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Labi, ka dzīvs un tā.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

viņš tikai tēlo!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Tas nav Džeimss Bonds?

(Reply to this)

Ar to teātri vispār kaut kas nav kārtībā. Pagājušogad tur skatījos vienu lugu pēc Hermaņa Heses. Viņi tur izlaida dzīvu vilku vienu pašu pa skatuvi bez nekādām siksnām vai drošības tīkla. Stratēģija bija, ka no vienas puses viņu palaiž, a otrā galā aizkulisēs stāv džeks un vicina gaļas gabalu. Labi, ka tam vilkam gribējās ēst a to fig viņ zin, kā vēl viss varēja beigties.
Šitas ir tikai uzņemtā radošā kursa konsekvence.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

neoreālisms!

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Jā, tā jau laikam viņi sauc to savu "mākslu".

Sapuvušais liberālisms.
Kas nākamais?! Pisuāri mākslas galerijā vai beigti dzīvnieki gleznu vietā?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

vienmēr gribējies zināt - kas ir liberālisms?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Ja aizej uz Vīnes teātri un tur aktieri griež sev rīkles, kamēr pa skatuvi skraida vilki, tā ir diezgan droša liberālisma pazīme.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

lol

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Pisuārs mākslas galerijā, Marcel Duchamp:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Marcel_Duchamp_Fountain_at_Tate_Modern_by_David_Shankbone.jpg/800px-Marcel_Duchamp_Fountain_at_Tate_Modern_by_David_Shankbone.jpg

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

jā, rakstnieks_nr1 to jau paredzēja!

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Baidos, ka tas jau atradās galerijā vēl pirms rakstnieks_nr1 bija ieņemts mātes miesās :
Fountain by Marcel Duchamp, 1917

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

tu taču zini, ka tas viss ir relatīvi

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Kuļikam jau līdzīgi izgāja tepat Rīgā

(Reply to this)